Monthly Archive for May, 2009

Page 4 of 4

Sketch: Amelia Alice Montgomery Merriweather.

Kat Johnston Sketch - Amelia Alice Montgomery Merriweather. Yes. That's her name.

Amelia Alice Montgomery Merriweather – she didn’t ask for the name, though her parents deemed her fit to receive it. There was no question as to whether it would be shortened. It would not. She’d have to bear the full brunt of it day in and day out, whether she behaved or not.

I was lucky – I only ever got called by my full name when I was in trouble. It was like an indicator on the trouble-o-metre: my shortened name meant ‘no, you’re not in trouble’, with the full name (including middle and last, of course), meaning ‘ok young lady, now you’ve really gone and done it’.

Names are funny things. My first and middle, when strung together, comes to mean ‘Pure lily’. One sister’s name becomes ‘Universal famous warrior’ with the other’s being ‘Graced star of the sea’. My husband’s turns into ‘He who supplants the black river’ (give or take). Amelia’s there would turn into ‘Industrious and noble power of man’ (again, give or take). That’s a lot to have in one teensie name, without for a second taking into account the last names there.

So… what does your name mean? I’ve been using this site to check on people’s names – and there are some quite interesting combinations coming out of it I must say!

When I said I liked -some- Spam…

Kat Johnston - oh look, another sketch. A crown of vines, this time, it would seem.

I wasn’t meaning that 91 spam comments within a day would be a good thing. Quite to the contrary, I find it fairly annoying, as I sift, with hope, to see if there might be one genuine one in the lot that might have somehow been looked over by the ‘regular comments’ pile. I’ve changed my mind. I don’t like spam. Not even the fun kind, or at least not in quite such copious quantities.

I think, perhaps, that it might be time for me to install a captcha (is that what it’s called?) device or something similar to stop automatic commenting – I swear that a good amount of it doesn’t come from any hits on the site, for the number of spam comments that come in on particular days actually exceeds the number of hits to the site. Have I been tagged somewhere as an easy target? Is there an automatic form set up in some place saying ‘enter your web address here, and we’ll spam all these little blogs with random, odd, and often annoying comments, some of which ‘look’ to be genuine’? I sincerely hope not, yet I have a feeling that it may be so.

Ah well, each to their own, I suppose. I know for certain that anyone who actually reads my blog is unlikely to want most of the products and scams that these spammers are sending on to be linked to, though you never know, I suppose. I’m not going to let my google page-rank (low as it may be) suffer any further by allowing those links to grace my site. So stop! Please, for the love of cheese, take me off your blasted lists and let me slip by without the barrage of ‘free movies, free viagra, oh look, cheap t-shirts!’ What is a girl to do, I ask, what is a girl to do?

Sketch: Karl de Waal’s ‘Purge’ at Doggett Street Studio

Kat Johnston Sketch: another girl, sporting unnaturally huge eyes... one day I will get sick of this look, but it may take a while - I still find them enchanting.

I’ve been meaning to mention this for a little while now, but I’ve not had the right feeling to sit down and type for a while, nor think deeply enough to form a well-written piece on this. Let’s give it a go, shall we?

After writing about his piece in the Temperature 2 exhibit at the Museum of Brisbane, Quilt for Melanie, Karl de Waal was kind enough to invite me along to his exhibition opening for Purge, at the Doggett Street Studio. He made the offer tempting indeed even, with the offer of buying me a cold beer! How could I say no to that?

I actually found it rather surreal. I can tend to be somewhat of a shut-in, finding gallery openings and exhibition events to be somewhat intimidating as I’m surrounded by art enthusiasts and people looking at ‘real art’, while I stand there trying to look as intelligent as my counterparts and not get noticed enough for anyone to ask me a question or start a conversation. One of those ‘better to remain silent and be thought a fool than remove all doubt’ things.

With my husband firmly in tow, I entered the press of people eagerly moving into the exhibition spaces, voices around me a a low, bubbling eddy of hushed whispers and more enthusiastic greetings among those known to each other. We advanced slowly, enjoying the works of other artists, filling each of the six exhibition spaces, pointing to the ones we liked, discussing how we thought certain things were done and simply marveling at the absolute skill that simply must be required to create some of the pieces.

For the paintings, our clear and decided favourites were created by Rosalind Edgar, stunningly vivid and vibrant landscapes infused with such rich, beautiful colours. Turning away from the ‘traditional’, pastoral scenes we generally seem to associate with Australian landscape art, these coax the audience into another perspective, into a broad, sweeping view that to me, seems to pick up on the very essence of the land rather than simply a pictorial rendering of ‘what is there’. Trust me when I say that the pictures of the exhibition do little justice to the pieces themselves – you have to go and see them.

And so we progressed, making our way slowly about the spaces; pausing, returning to those we liked, doing the circuit more than once. We lingered no small amount of time in Karl’s exhibition space, bearing an assortment of sculpture and one painted work which proclaimed a number of sweethearts sentiments quite against any you would find in a regular packet.

For me, ‘The Hands of Mr Potato Head Save the Innocent’, and ‘Kenny Starburst’ featured as favourites (I will admit, I have an almost unnatural love of type-writers and type-writer keys, not to mention vintage toys…), with a fair few others following close behind. ‘You’ve Got Mail’, I think, was the title of the little critter which sat beside the doorway – though critter he may not have meant to be, that piece exuded so much personality from it I would have bundled it up and stolen it away myself to give it a home with me, feeding it all the letters it desired while it sat upon its sturdy yet almost spindley little 60′s tv cabinet style legs.

‘Reflector’ was an instant hit with my husband – the way the pieces seemed to be made for each other, to be fitted together without anything looking out of place or seeming to be altered to slot together so perfectly. As he put it so simply, it was ‘one of those pieces where you know you’d find something new in it every day’, from the way the shadow in the recess would undoubtedly move as the day progressed, to the shapes each crack may form as you looked at it from another angle. I personally love playing that game with myself – seeing what shapes emerge from a tile or splotch of discolouration, noticing a gorilla peeking out at me in one instant, a penguin at another, or perhaps a couple living out a miniature drama with a mix of passion and forlorn desire on the surface of a linoleum square. In this case though, the almost unquenchable desire to touch was hard to quash – give me a wonderful texture and peeling paint, and even the sanctity of art is no match with my want to leave my own little touch upon it for every person after me to see. Luckily, perhaps, I was well behaved and did no such thing.

And then we met Karl, the hubby pointing and crowing ‘That’s him, bet you anything,’ before sidling closer and urging me to say hello. I don’t exhibit shyness all the time, but speaking to an artist I admire (especially when I’ve already gone all fan-girlie on one of their artworks) does make me want to go ‘uhhhh, I’m sure he has better people to talk to than me…’ What did I come away from the conversation with? A little bit more insight, and a realization that it really is time to update my profile pictures again – my hair is no longer short and pink, but a few inches longer and quite a dark purple!

Thank you Karl, for the wonderful evening – it was a great pleasure to attend your opening and meet you in person. And for all the rest of you, go ahead and check it out yourself! Karl’s exhibition, Purge, is open until the 16th of May at Doggett Street Studio.

On an unrelated note… I hate American spell-checks. Colour is spelled with a ‘u’, goddamnit.

Sketch: Blue Love with a side of spam.

Kat Johnston Sketch: a little girl, as usual with absolutely nothing to do with the text of this post. Surprise surprise.

Last night I went to see Blue Love, now on at La Boite. I enjoyed it! It was an interesting blend of many different things, smushed together into something entirely fun, yet thought provoking. Arriving home, the hubby and I had a rather interesting conversation regarding Simon (a bit player in the play, as it were).

Centred entirely around the concept of love the play takes stage with only one set, which does not change throughout its entirity. Simon, a stuffed dog (taxidermied – he’s very realistic!) forming part of the set, in no way involved with the action between the couple. He just sits there, his own little picture also beside the door of the ‘bedroom’, neither taking part in the drama laid out before us, nor shying away from it… he’s just… there.

Anyhow, it was a great show. I must admit, I found it a little shakey to start off with (I tend to get a little concerned if there is bribery of beer and popcorn before the show has even begun!), but the moment Glenn opened his mouth to sing his first musical piece, the lights dimming and the room going silent, it had won my heart. My god, what a voice! Absolutely enchanting.

It certainly isn’t a show for everyone, methinks. However, if the thought of a man naked, save for a bunch of grapes covering an essential area approaching a lovely elderly lady in the crowd, inviting her to pluck one from the bunch seems like fun, then you might want to check it out.

And now for some interesting spam, links removed. I was talking about how I liked spam like this the other day, and now I’ve gotten some – yayyyy! Be prepared for some grammatically incorrect, rather garbled nonsense:

Franciscans held colonize the they will ogre ancestry skull loose agreement with way her could hope and makes such eagerness around this the honey concept has watching when fulfill their was needed was already would reverse had struck search them language and goblin romance had managed this must liked about  conspiracy and foolish passing would break sad about pretend her and mat her dimples like another attractive and the double himself into daddy will fed the flung her somewhere where through and then brought invisible horse the desk flaccid soul them jealous that mattered recessive malady deepened and merwoman did came may ask wipe out for the can come hand touched the finger for good yet decided threw them dragonfly and harpies were she let and when must help yet she uncertain species and climbed and they the realization immediately the suddenly interested newly separated their travel had said condemn mushy horse trotted said expansively might chose return randomly life seems swear.